Resources to help Local Detention Management Committees
Adverse consequences of remote detention can be mitigated by measures that include providing defense counsel greater ease of access to remotely detained clients, and by ensuring that detainees have reasonable opportunities to review e-discovery. Remote detention can be reduced by lowering the rate of detention. The RDWG recommends the formation of local Detention Management Committees to address these and other detention-related challenges faced in each district.
Mission of the local Detention Management Committees is to create policies and practices to address detention management challenges in each district. Each Committee should establish a meeting schedule to ensure regular discussion and collaboration.
Membership of the Local Detention Management Committees may include:
| Judges | United States Marshals Service |
| U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services Office | United States Attorney’s Office |
| Federal Defender Organization | Bureau of Prisons |
| CJA panel | Local law enforcement |
| Circuit-based case budgeting attorney | Local jails and detention centers |
RDWG member agencies are available to assist in the formation and success of local detention management committees.
Need help? Contact national partners for assistance.
![]() | Detention Management Committee checklist A tool to help guide local stakeholders working to establish detention management committees. |
![]() | Sample approach for enabling pretrial detainee access to e-discovery This report from the eDiscovery Working Group of the District of Massachusetts explains how the group, after several meetings and visits to the most often used jails, developed more uniform and efficient practices for the production of e-discovery and for the review of e-discovery by pretrial detainees. The report also describes training provided to criminal justice practitioners, and the group's ongoing work to refine e-discovery protocols, improve pretrial detainee access to e-discovery, and train the bar on new developments. |
![]() | Federal Defender maintained computers at detention centers This memorandum by the Federal Public Defender Office for the Western District of Missouri explains how that office facilitates pretrial detainee review of e-discovery by maintaining computers at all state and local facilities used by the U.S. Marshals Service in the district. |
![]() | Kiosks for virtual client meetings This bulletin explains that the clerk's office for the Northern District of New York installed and maintains video kiosks at four detention facilities in the district, and administers attorney-client meetings and probation and pretrial services interviews through videoconferencing. |
![]() | Minimum Standards for Virtual Attorney-Client Meetings Through its Performance Measurement Working Group and Defender Services Advisory Group, the federal defender community identifies minimum standards for virtual client meetings in pretrial facilities. |
![]() | Have you started a Local Detention Committee in your district? |





